blog trackingRealtime Web Statistics Iran | Gregory D. Evans - Part 8

Posts Tagged ‘Iran’

Insight: Did Conficker help sabotage Iran program

(Reuters) – A cyber warfare expert claims he has linked the Stuxnet computer virus that attacked Iran’s nuclear program in 2010 to Conficker, a mysterious “worm” that surfaced in late 2008 and infected millions of PCs. Conficker was used to open back doors into computers in Iran, then infect them with Stuxnet, according to research from John Bumgarner, a retired U.S. Army special-operations …

View full post on computer worm – Yahoo! News Search Results

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

How the world’s first cyber ‘super weapon’ attacked Iran – and now threatens the world

The computer ‘worm’ Stuxnet marked a ‘new chapter in human history’, says the expert who unravelled it – a chapter where anyone can attack electrical plants and even nuclear facilities with ‘cyber weapons’ from the internet.

View full post on computer worm – Yahoo! News Search Results

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Experts suggest US and allies involved in covert operations in Iran

Could the United States and allies such as Israel already be involved in a covert war against Iran? Many former US intelligence officials and Iran experts have suggested so with the alleged shooting down of a US Air Force unmanned drone last weekend over Iran adding to the growing belief that covert operations are being staged against Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs.

Despite the lack of visual evidence to back up the Iranian claims that the RQ170 reconnaissance aircraft was shot down and captured on Sunday or any confirmation from the US that one of its drones was missing, even the suggestion that a US military aircraft could have penetrated Iran’s eastern airspace near the border with Afghanistan adds to the suspicion that a covert campaign could be underway.

Combined with reports of explosions at military bases in Iran, the release of tailor-made computer viruses and the assassination of Iranian scientists linked to Tehran’s nuclear program, some security analysts are joining the dots to form a picture of an undeclared conflict unfolding within Iran’s borders.

Accidents to blame

Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  The Iranian regime said the military blast was an accident

Explosions in the city of Isfahan, home of one of Iran’s contested uranium conversion plants, and at a Revolutionary Guard Corps military base near Tehran during November were attributed to accidents by the Iranian government rather than sabotage carried out by external aggressors.

The November blasts followed a series of three similar explosions over a 24-hour period in October which came days after the US revealed that agents allegedly acting for the Revolutionary Guard were involved in a plot to kill the Saudi Arabian ambassador to Washington in a restaurant in the US capital.

It’s a long-held belief that years of international sanctions have weakened Iran’s commercial and military infrastructure and have made working conditions more dangerous; a situation which could explain the dozen or so unexplained blasts at Iranian gas pipelines, oil installations and military facilities which have occurred over the past two years.

However, the blast at the military base on November 12, which leveled most of the buildings and killed 17 people, also claimed the life of General Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam, a founder of Iran’s ballistic missile program. An explosion which killed such a high-profile official with links to the very program that the US, Israel and other allies are looking to disable on the exact day he would be at the base could be seen as more than just a coincidence.

Each blast location over the past few months also featured the three key elements of Iran’s nuclear program: facilities used for uranium conversion, enrichment and the manufacture of delivery systems, i.e. missiles.

Also, if these explosions were caused by accidents, why would the Iranian regime be hiding its key scientists such as Mohsen Fakrizadeh, said to be the father of the Iranian nuclear program, and burying its facilities deeper underground as it is reportedly doing?

Covert tactics?

Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Iranian scientists have been targeted in bomb attacks

Of course, in a covert war, by its nature, no-one claims responsibility. There has been no acknowledgement of involvement by anyone in the explosions or in the deaths of two senior Iranian nuclear physicists killed by car bombs in the past 12 months. The mystery extends to the source of the Stuxnet computer worm which was secretly fed into Iran’s nuclear program in 2010, causing centrifuges used to enrich uranium to spin out of control and shatter.

“It seems very plausible that covert operations against the Iranian nuclear program have already been going on for some time,” Michael Bauer, the head of the Middle East Program at the Center for Applied Policy Research in Munich, told Deutsche Welle.

 

Professor Volker Perthers, director of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, is more cautious in his assessment. “(However), rather than speaking of a covert war, I see patterns of a Cold War and containment – remember that in the Cold War, covert operations of this or a similar kind were used rather frequently.”

 

The usual suspects of the US, Israel and other allies such as Britain and France are being held responsible by the Iranian regime of either being directly or indirectly involved in all or some of these incidents.

 

Iran says it has arrested dozens of CIA informants in recent months, a claim that has been reluctantly confirmed by the US.

 

Dr. Elizabeth Iskander, an Iran expert at the London School of Economics, told Deutsche Welle that both sides have engaged in covert activities aimed at subverting each other. 

 

“Iran is believed to have carried out targeted assassinations of Iranian dissidents in Europe, particularly in the 1990s. In 2010 there was Stuxnet and also the apparent abduction of Iranian scientist Shahram Amiri. Iran believes the US government was behind both of these incidents,” she said.

 

Some security experts believe the level of sophistication of the attacks taking place in Iran suggests that Israel’s Mossad and possibly also a Western partner such as the CIA or Britain’s MI6 are behind them but that a local group – perhaps the Mujahedeen Khalq (MEK), an Iranian opposition group blacklisted by the US as a terrorist organization – is providing assistance on the ground.

 

“The MEK has a long history of confrontation with the Iranian government and has carried out terrorist attacks in Iran while maintaining an active opposition-in-exile organisation based in France,” said Dr. Iskander. 

 

“The EU took the group off its terrorist list in 2009 and there are reports the US is considering following suit. There has apparently been cooperation with the MEK in the past in terms of information sharing.”

 

Doubts over US involvement

 

Not everyone believes that a covert war is being waged on Iran. There is some doubt that the US would sanction a bombing campaign which would amount to sponsoring terrorism, a charge Washington regularly levels at Tehran, or authorize the targeted killing of Iranian scientists – although US President Barack Obama has authorized the killing of al Qaeda members and other suspected militants, including at least one US citizen in Yemen.

 

Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Some experts say the US just wants to disrupt Iran’s progress

Those who don’t support the idea of an unfolding covert war suggest that the US secret services capability could not stretch much beyond its usual level of interference: the supplying of faulty parts, plans or software to hinder Iran’s weapons programs.

 

Others say that if the US and Israel wanted to militarily disable Iran, they wouldn’t be wasting their time chipping away at the regime through targeted assassinations and selective bombings. The main objective could just be disruption in a bid to buy time.

 

“The US has made it rather clear that it wants to avoid a war,” Prof. Perthes said. “Diplomacy and sanctions would be the preferred means to reach this goal, but if that doesn’t suffice, covert operations of this sort seem to be the chosen additional option. Neither the US, Israel or Iran want to escalate this toward open war; this may explain why one doesn’t link foreign parties directly.”

 

Even if the US or Israel are not involved, the belief that they could be may also be having the desired effect on the Iranians. Headlines about unsolved killings, unexplained explosions and sinister computer viruses will have scientists working on the nation’s nuclear program rattled; the psychological effects of not knowing what could happen or when may be just as destabilizing as actual covert attacks.

 

Author: Nick Amies

Editor: Rob Mudge

Article source: http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,15579161,00.html?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Analysis: “Cold War” with Iran heats up across Mideast

LONDON (Reuters) – Worries of Israel striking Iran might or might not be overblown but across the region the largely hidden “cold war” between Tehran and its enemies is escalating fast, bringing with it wider risk of conflict.

Speculation Israel might attack Iran’s nuclear program has been rife in the Israeli media and oil markets in recent weeks, with concerns that Tehran might retaliate with devastating attacks on Gulf oil shipments.

But that debate, experts say, misses large parts of the bigger picture. An increasingly isolated Iran alarms not just Israel and the West but its Gulf neighbors, especially longtime foe Saudi Arabia, and they are already fighting back – and the confrontation goes well beyond simply tightening sanctions.

From proxy wars in Iraq and Syria to computer worm attacks and unexplained explosions in Iran – to allegations of an assassination plot in Washington – a confrontation once kept behind the scenes is breaking into increasingly open view.

The storming of Britain’s Tehran embassy last week – and the tit-for-tat shutdown of Iran’s embassy in London – were just the latest signs that already limited dialogue is beginning to break down. That, analysts say, is inherently dangerous.

“With Iran, you have a government that is increasingly isolated and acting in increasingly unpredictable ways,” says Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and National Studies in Washington.

“There is certainly the risk that a country will take the deliberate decision to attack Iran. But there is also the risk that something happens that provokes… a war that nobody planned and nobody wants.”

With the euro zone crisis still far from over and worldwide demand already faltering, such action and the resulting oil price surge could be disastrous for the global economy.

Confrontation is, of course, far from new. Tehran has long used militant groups such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah and Hamas in the Palestinian territories to shape regional politics and strike enemies, particularly Israel.

The United States and Britain long accused Iran of using Shi’ite Muslim militias in Iraq to kill Western troops and impose Tehran’s agenda.

The Sunni-ruled states of the Gulf, particularly Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, say Iran stirs up unrest in their Shi’ite communities, although many Western analysts believe blaming Iran for protests this year in those countries is an overstatement or at least oversimplification.

Many such confrontations across the region appear escalating fast – and becoming much harder for Washington and its allies to control.

PROXY WARS

“U.S. and Western power in the region is weakening, and that is leaving a vacuum – most notably in Iraq – and you can see the main stakeholders in the region reacting to Iran’s readiness to fill that vacuum,” says Reva Bhalla, head of analysis at US private intelligence company Stratfor.

This year’s uprising in Syria – Iran’s rare Arab friend – has created a new battlefield. Since the early days of the uprising, U.S. officials repeatedly and pointedly said they believed Assad’s government was receiving support from Tehran.

Assad has since been rapidly abandoned by the Arab League, in a diplomatic effort led by Saudi Arabia and the other Sunni Arab Gulf states. Analysts and officials say that could have as much to do with pushing back against Iran as in reining in killings and rights abuses in Syria itself.

Saudi or other Arab backing for the increasingly armed opposition could escalate matters further, potentially producing a sectarian civil war lasting years and spilling across borders into neighboring states.

In Iraq, the withdrawal of U.S. forces by the end of this year leaves more room for both Iran and Sunni Arab neighbors to intervene through proxy militias. At worst, that could reignite the Sunni-Shia infighting that nearly tore the country apart during the US occupation.

“A proxy Saudi-Iranian war in Iraq represents a very considerable threat to oil supplies,” said Alastair Newton, chief political analyst at Japanese bank Nomura.

POWER STRUGGLE

Some of the increased friction with its neighbors could be a symptom of a power struggle within Iran itself, Newton said.

“I think one of the reasons you’re seeing temperature rising between Iran and others is because you’re seeing temperature rising in Tehran itself.”

Recent events such as the embassy storming, in which Iran seemed willing to tear up the international rulebook, could be a sign of increasing clout of hardline clerics and Revolutionary Guard commanders.

The attack on Britain’s embassy prompted widespread international condemnation and looks to have ushered in a much tighter sanctions. That too may strengthen the hardliners.

The United States said in October it had caught Iran plotting to blow up the Saudi ambassador to Washington DC in a downtown restaurant. Whether or not the plot was genuine – and whoever was behind it – it marked a further worsening of relations.

COVERT ACTION

Iran’s enemies appear to be using unconventional methods against it, suspected of striking within its borders. Israel and the United States both make clear they view covert operations as a sensible alternative to conventional military action.

Last year’s Stuxnet computer worm, which damaged computers used in industrial machinery, was widely believed to have been a U.S.-Israeli attack to cripple Iranian nuclear centrifuges.

Several Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed or disappeared, and Iran blames U.S. or Israeli intelligence services.

Two explosions last month in Iran, one of which killed a Revolutionary Guards gunnery general and around a dozen other officers, prompted widespread speculation in Israel that its intelligence services were involved.

Iran said the first blast was an accident and has not given clear accounts of the second incident.

Israeli officials refuse to confirm or deny they were behind any specific incidents. Several commentators and newspapers warned such action could still backfire badly – perhaps prompting the kind of rocket attacks on Israel launched last week by Hizbollah from Lebanon.

“Faced with such operations, the Iranian regime is embarking on and will embark on a series of actions of its own,” said a front-page article in the Israeli newspaper Maariv by Nadav Eyal, foreign editor for Israel’s Channel Ten television.

As to whether a deliberate air strike on Iran’s nuclear program is genuinely more likely in the coming months, experts are divided. The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq makes it possible for Israeli jets to pass through its airspace without needing U.S. permission. But many say the costs would be too high.

“The problem is that no one knows what the mid-term consequences would be,” said Alterman at Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It could simply encourage the regime in place and intensify their commitment to following a nuclear program with even more energy than before.”

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams in Jerusalem; Editing by Peter Graff)

Article source: http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-cold-war-iran-heats-across-mideast-163115911.html

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Did PC worm help sabotage Iran nuke program?

A cyber warfare expert claims he has linked the Stuxnet computer virus that attacked Iran’s nuclear program in 2010 to Conficker, a mysterious “worm” that surfaced in late 2008 and infected millions of PCs.

View full post on computer worm – Yahoo! News Search Results

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Duqu returns to Iran


IT
WORLD

 



Article source: http://atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/MK19Dj02.html

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Iran secrecy to blame for Duqu infections, claims researcher

An Iranian government official yesterday acknowledged that the Duqu attacks had infected computers in the country but claimed that the Trojan was “under control,” according to a report by a state-run news agency.

In response, an antivirus researcher blamed Iran for giving hackers a half year’s free hand with Duqu, saying that Iran’s policy of not sharing samples delayed the detection of the malware and the patching of the Windows zero day it exploited.

On Sunday, Brigadier General Gholamreza Jalali told the official IRNA news agency that some computers in Iran had been infected with Duqu, that possible targets were being checked for infections, and that the country’s specialists had crafted defenses against the Trojan.

Jalali heads Iran’s Passive Defense Organisation, a military unit responsible for constructing and defending the country’s nuclear enrichment facilities. He is a former commander in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard.

“The software to control the virus has been developed and made available to organsations and corporations [in Iran],” Jalali told IRNA, according to translations of the original story by Western news outlets. “The elimination (process) was carried out and the organisations penetrated by the virus are under control.”

Stuxnet similarities

Iranian officials made similar statements last year about the Stuxnet worm, an ultra-advanced piece of malware that most analysts believe was aimed at Iran’s budding nuclear programme.

Some security experts, including researchers at Symantec, have said that Duqu may be a precursor to another Stuxnet, the two share several similarities, although the former seems designed for reconnaissance and data theft, not for an attack on physical facilities.

Kaspersky Lab suspects that Iran was hit with Duqu in April 2011.

In a recent analysis of Duqu, Kaspersky said that the “Stars” malware, which Jalali confirmed had targeted Iranian machines in April, was likely a part of Duqu.

“Most probably, the Iranians found a keylogger module that had been loaded onto a system… [and] it’s possible that the Iranian specialists found just the keylogger, while the main Duqu module and the dropper, including the documents that contained the then-unknown vulnerability, may have gone undetected,” Kaspersky noted.

Like most malware, Duqu is composed of several pieces, including an exploit of a Windows kernel mode driver vulnerability, a “dropper” that loads additional malicious code, a keylogger and a data theft component.

The keylogger bundled with a Duqu variant that Kaspersky obtained from Sudanese researchers contained a photograph of a far-away galaxy, which may have been the genesis of Iran’s naming the malware as Stars. The attack against the Sudanese target was also conducted in April 2011.

“We’re convinced, in at least one of these Duqu attacks, that the keylogger Iran identified as Stars was actually the same as the one included with Duqu,” said Roel Schouwenberg, a senior researcher with Kaspersky.

Cloak and dagger

Kaspersky blamed Iran for not sharing the Stars malware with other countries’ security researchers, a move that delayed the detection and subsequent public disclosure of the threat.

“We can’t be sure what they detected, only the keylogger or if they traced everything back to the dropper that used the Windows zero day,” said Schouwenberg. “Obviously, if they had found the Word document [used to plant the malware] and shared that, we would have detected the zero day and presumably Microsoft would have patched that a long time ago.”

Microsoft has confirmed that Duqu relies on an exploit of a yet-unpatched or “zero day” bug in the TrueType parsing engine tucked into the “W32k.sys” kernel mode driver. The company has issued instructions for a temporary defence, but has not yet patched the vulnerability.

Last April, security analysts expressed frustration that they were unable to verify Iran’s claims about Stars because the country would not share samples of the malware.

Calling Iran’s refusal to share the samples “not a smart move,” Schouwenberg argued that it “gave attackers a half-year head start.”

Even if all Iran had was Stars, in other words the keylogger, sharing it would have been valuable to those who have been targeted and infected since April.

“Just having the keylogger would not have been as beneficial, but even if all we had was that, we could have created detections for the keylogger, which would have deflected some attacks,” said Schouwenberg.

And with all the attention paid to Stuxnet by Western researchers, researchers would have dug into the keylogger in earnest, and perhaps managed to connect it with malicious Word documents that exploited the Windows kernel bug.

“With the way it was positioned at the time by Iran, as a possible Stuxnet, it would have piqued the interest of researchers,” Schouwenberg said. “There would have been a lot of reasons for people to start digging.”

Article source: http://rss.feedsportal.com/c/270/f/3551/s/1a19eb03/l/0Lnews0Btechworld0N0Csecurity0C33183260Ciran0Esecrecy0Eto0Eblame0Efor0Eduqu0Einfections0Eclaims0Eresearcher0C0Dolo0Frss/story01.htm

View full post on National Cyber Security » Computer Hacking

Suspicion falls on Israel as new computer ‘supervirus’ hits Iran

Iran says its defence computer systems have been infected with a “supervirus” similar to one believed to have been created by Israel which severely damaged Tehran’s nuclear program last year.

Anti-virus experts have identified a virus called Duqu that they said shared properties with the Stuxnet worm apparently created by Mossad, the Israeli security service. It was thought to have targeted the nuclear program’s centrifuges, the devices that enrich uranium to create nuclear fuel.

It was not clear from the Iranian statement whether Duqu had also struck nuclear facilities, but it was the regime’s first admission of damage.

“We are in the initial phase of fighting the Duqu virus,” said Gholamreza Jalali, the head of Iran’s civil defence program. “The final report which says which organisations the virus has spread to and what its impacts are has not been completed yet. All the organisations and centres that could be susceptible to being contaminated are being controlled.”

Mossad and other Western intelligence agencies have made no comment on sabotage operations against Iran, as Western leaders continue to argue about whether military action would justified. A report by the International Atomic Energy Agency last week claimed that Iran was developing technology to fit nuclear warheads to missiles.

William Hague, the British Foreign Secretary, said that Britain was not yet “calling for, or advocating, military action”, but added: “At the same time, we are saying that all options are on the table.” Guido Westerwelle, the German foreign minister, said harsh sanctions were unavoidable but he would not consider military intervention.

Even Israel is split, with Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, and Ehud Barak, the defence minister, said to be in favour, but a majority against.

The Stuxnet virus altered the speed at which the enrichment centrifuges spun until they were out of control. It was so sophisticated that experts said it must have been the work of an advanced, probably national, sabotage program. Duqu operates differently, though using some of the same code to infiltrate computers, sending back information to its handlers rather than breaking down systems. The virus was spread through an infected Microsoft Word document.

Symantec, the computer security firm, which has led investigations into Stuxnet and Duqu, said the new virus seemed to be intended to gain remote access to computer systems.

“The authors had access to the Stuxnet source code,” Symantec said. “The attackers are looking for information such as design documents that could help mount an attack on an industrial control facility. Duqu is essentially the precursor to a Stuxnet-like attack.”

Israel has done little to hide its glee at a series of “problems” faced by Iran’s weapons and nuclear programs.

An explosion at a missile base on Saturday killed 17 members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, including Hassan Moghaddam, the brigadier-general in charge of missile development. Its similarity to an explosion at a base in October last year caused speculation that both were the work of Mossad. “I don’t know the extent of the explosion,” said Mr Barak on Sunday night. “But it would be desirable if they multiply.”

Article source: http://www.canada.com/Suspicion+falls+Israel+computer+supervirus+hits+Iran/5708814/story.html

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Gergory Evans

Gregory Evans | LinkedIn

Interview With Gregory Evans

Gregory Evans Security Expert

Gregory Evans on Cyber Crime

Iran claims defence computer systems hit by another ‘supervirus’

Western leaders continue to argue among themselves about whether military
action against is justified, most recently in the light of a report by the
International Atomic Energy Agency last week which claimed to have evidence
Iran was developing technology to fit nuclear warheads to missiles.

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, said Britain was not yet “calling for,
or advocating, military action.” But he added: “At the same time, we are
saying that all options are on the table.”

Germany’s foreign minister, Guido Westerwelle, on the other hand said harsh
sanctions were unavoidable in the absence of Iranian co-operation with the
IAEA but said he would not consider military intervention.

Even the Israeli cabinet is split, with the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and defence minister Ehud Barak said to be in favour, but a majority
against.

The Stuxnet virus altered the speed at which the enriching centrifuges spun
until they were out of control. It was so sophisticated that the experts who
discovered it said it could only have been the work of an advanced, probably
national, sabotage programme.

It has been widely reported that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, was
responsible, with help from American and British counterparts.

According to computer virus experts, duqu operates differently, though using
some of the same code to infiltrate computers, sending back further
information to its handlers rather than breaking down systems.

First spotted in September by academics in Budapest, it was spread through an
infected Microsoft Word document. It has also struck in India, France and
Ukraine.

The computer security firm Symantec, which has been the lead investigator on
Stuxnet and Duqu, said the new virus seemed aimed at gaining the user remote
access to computer systems.

“It is apparent to Symantec that the authors of this new threat had access to
the Stuxnet source code, not just Stuxnet binaries,” it said, hinting that
the authors of the two viruses might be the same.

“Duqu’s purpose is to gather intelligence data and assets from entities, such
as industrial control system manufacturers, in order to more easily conduct
a future attack against another third party.

“The attackers are looking for information such as design documents that could
help them mount a future attack on an industrial control facility. Thus,
Duqu is essentially the precursor to a future Stuxnet-like attack.”

If the virus is a Mossad creation, Israeli leaders may have another reason to
congratulate themselves. While not claiming responsibility, they have done
nothing to hide their glee at a series of “problems” faced by Iran’s weapons
and nuclear programmes.

An explosion at a missile base on Saturday killed 17 members of the
Revolutionary Guard, including the brigadier-general in charge of missile
development, Hassan Moghaddam. The incident’s similarity to an explosion at
a major base housing long-range Shahab-3 missiles in October of last year
triggered speculation both were the work of Mossad.

“I don’t know the extent of the explosion,” Ehud Barak, the defence minister,
told military radio on Sunday night. “But it would be desirable if they
multiply.”

Article source: http://telegraph.feedsportal.com/c/32726/f/568301/s/1a13ff43/l/0L0Stelegraph0O0Cnews0Cworldnews0Cmiddleeast0Ciran0C88889670CIran0Eclaims0Edefence0Ecomputer0Esystems0Ehit0Eby0Eanother0Esupervirus0Bhtml/story01.htm

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Gergory Evans

New computer virus detected in Iran

New computer virus detected in Iran

(JTA) – A computer virus similar to the Stuxnet virus that attacked Iran’s nuclear program last year has been detected in Iran.

Iran said Sunday that it had found the Duqu computer virus in some Islamic Republic computer systems, but that it has been contained and neutralized, the head of Iran’s civil defense branch, Brig.-Gen. Gholamreza Jalali, told the Tehran Times.

Duqu is designed to gather data such as keystrokes from computer systems that will help it to launch future attacks on the systems, the Symantec company said in a report after the virus was discovered last month.

Stuxnet, the computer worm that some say set back Iran’s nuclear program by several months or years, affected some of Iran’s computer systems and centrifuges used to enrich uranium after it was released last year. The New York Times reported that it was a joint project of Israel and the United States. Iran had to replace 1,000 Stuxnet-damaged centrifuges at its main uranium enrichment plant at Natanz last year.

The report added that the creators of the Duqu program had access to the Stuxnet source code.

“Duqu is essentially the precursor to a future Stuxnet-like attack,” according to Symantec.
 

Click to login and write a letter to the editor or sign up for the Daily Briefing.

Article source: http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/11/14/3090273/new-computer-virus-detected-in-iran

View full post on National Cyber Security » Virus/Malware/Worms

Gregory Evans | LinkedIn

Interview With Gregory Evans

Gregory Evans Security Expert

Gregory Evans on Cyber Crime

Page 8 of 10« First...«678910»