#parent | #kids | Unintended Consequences And Weak Spots In Child Education Programs – Education | #predators | #childpredators | #kids



To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Teaching children to resist abuse, particularly sexual abuse, is

a very popular child protection technique.  A recent scoping

review of many popular programs, however, shows that few of them

are in line with recent research in the child protection field.

The most serious weakness that the study identified is that the
key message of the programs is that children have a responsibility
to protect themselves.  What adults intend as empowerment
actually becomes just another source of responsibility and guilt.
 The researchers concluded that programs need to revamp their
emphasis to avoid contributing to the already-existing shame and
guilt that survivors feel.

The review also noted several other flaws in most existing
programs:

  • Programs by and large emphasize sexual abuse and either
    don’t discuss or don’t emphasize other forms of abuse
    that children may face.
  • Most of the programs emphasize “stranger danger,”
    overlooking the fact that most sexual abuse is perpetrated by
    people whom children and their parents trust.  The programs
    also don’t adequately teach children how to recognize and
    avoid typical grooming behavior.  Finally, the programs
    don’t deal with the fact that children may find emotional
    warmth and connection with their abusers, even though they dislike
    the abuse itself.
  • Most programs encourage children to resist abuse without
    considering whether resistance is viable.  For many children,
    circumstances and developmental level make resistance more
    dangerous than compliance.  The programs’ emphasis on
    resistance again adds to the shame and guilt that the children
    experience.
  • Child education programs also encourage disclosure, but
    don’t train the people to whom they are likely to disclose.
     The researchers noted that family and community training
    about how to respond to disclosures would do quite a bit to elicit
    more disclosures from children.   Encouraging disclosure also
    downplays the sometimes negative repercussions that children
    experience and, at the very least, do not adequately prepare them
    for how the system actually works.
  • Finally, the programs completely overlooked some sources of
    abuse, such as online predators, and uniquely vulnerable
    populations, such as disabled children.  The researchers
    recommended development of additional programs targeting these
    problems and populations.

Child education programs are motivated by good intentions, but
there is little evidence that they meet their intended goal.
 If we insist on having such programs, however, this scoping
review identifies some weaknesses that we need to address.
 The solutions are not simple, but we need to find nuanced
ways to deal with a complicated problem.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Consumer Protection from United States

Consumer Financial Services: UDAAP Round Up
Mayer Brown
Welcome to the latest edition of the UDAAP Round-Up. This newsletter is designed to provide you with a periodic resource to stay abreast of federal activities regarding the prohibition on unfair…

FTC Updates (October 10-21, 2022)
Crowell & Moring
It’s rulemaking week at the FTC, particularly within the Bureau of Consumer Protection. The agency announced multiple Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking for public comment in connection…

State AG Updates: October 6-12, 2022
Crowell & Moring
Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. Here are this week’s updates.

State AG Updates: October 13-19, 2022
Crowell & Moring
Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. Here are this week’s updates.

Click here for the original source.

.  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .   .   .   .    .    .   .   .   .   .   .  .   .   .   .  .  .   .  .





Source link